Muthala Parameswari vs Manikandan — 41/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Service Pending-Warrant. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120008232024
e-Filing Number
04-03-2024
Filing Number
823/2024
Filing Date
18-Mar-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
18-Mar-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muthala Parameswari
Adv. bharathi raja
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manikandan
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
10-Mar-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
19-Jan-2026
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
16-Dec-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
28-Oct-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
28-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
11-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
15-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
02-Jul-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
06-May-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
03-Feb-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
07-Jan-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
04-Dec-2024
Copy of depositionView PDF
This is a deposition of witness (PW.1) in Criminal Case No. 41/2024 before the Fast Track Court in Karaikudi, recorded on 04.12.2024. The complainant testified regarding his diamond and jewellery business (LMS Diamonds and Jewellery, registered 01.09.2013) and produced bank statements from multiple banks (Karur Vysya Bank, City Union Bank, and HDFC) covering various periods between 2020-2021, along with documentary evidence including a remittance certificate and correspondence with Indian Overseas Bank dated 19.10.2023 and subsequent notices. The witness examination was completed without cross-examination, and the court accepted his testimony as truthful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
12-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
05-Nov-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
09-Oct-2024
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
08-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
23-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
04-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
07-Jun-2024
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
03-May-2024
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
19-Apr-2024
Issue of Process
Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi
-
18-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2024
This is a deposition of witness (PW.1) in Criminal Case No. 41/2024 before the Fast Track Court in Karaikudi, recorded on 04.12.2024. The complainant testified regarding his diamond and jewellery business (LMS Diamonds and Jewellery, registered 01.09.2013) and produced bank statements from multiple banks (Karur Vysya Bank, City Union Bank, and HDFC) covering various periods between 2020-2021, along with documentary evidence including a remittance certificate and correspondence with Indian Overseas Bank dated 19.10.2023 and subsequent notices. The witness examination was completed without cross-examination, and the court accepted his testimony as truthful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts