Subramaniyan vs Vignesh — 12/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV120001932024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
193/2024
Filing Date
22-01-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
22-01-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subramaniyan
Adv. R.Parthasarathi
Respondent(s)
Vignesh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate (FTC ML), Karaikudi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 12/2024 (Subramaniyan v. Vignesh) Outcome: Cross-examination of petitioner Subramaniyan completed; case proceedings documented on 26.03.2026. Details: This is a civil case involving a money lending dispute. Petitioner Subramaniyan testified that he lent money to respondent Vignesh in June 2022 for settling debts, without any written agreement or receipt. The respondent allegedly promised to repay within one month but delayed for approximately one year. A bank cheque was provided on 26.07.2023 but reportedly had signature discrepancies. Subramaniyan denied engaging in unauthorized financial activities and claimed adequate income sources. The court recorded his examination-in-chief and cross-examination statements regarding the loan transaction details, repayment conditions, and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 12/2024 (Subramaniyan v. Vignesh) Outcome: Cross-examination of petitioner Subramaniyan completed; case proceedings documented on 26.03.2026. Details: This is a civil case involving a money lending dispute. Petitioner Subramaniyan testified that he lent money to respondent Vignesh in June 2022 for settling debts, without any written agreement or receipt. The respondent allegedly promised to repay within one month but delayed for approximately one year. A bank cheque was provided on 26.07.2023 but reportedly had signature discrepancies. Subramaniyan denied engaging in unauthorized financial activities and claimed adequate income sources. The court recorded his examination-in-chief and cross-examination statements regarding the loan transaction details, repayment conditions, and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts