Vijakumar vs Thiruppathyrajan — 76/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV120001012026

Filing Number

101/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thiruppathyrajan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    IA orderView PDF

    Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.76 of 2026 Court Decision: The petition was dismissed. The Karaikudi Fast Track Court rejected accused Vijayakumar's request to reopen the complainant's evidence in a cheque dishonour case (₹5,00,000 under Negotiable Instruments Act). The court found the petition was filed belatedly and without sufficient reason, noting that Vijayakumar had been given multiple opportunities to present his defence evidence (11.12.2025, 03.01.2026, 22.01.2026, 05.02.2026) but failed to utilize them. The court ruled that since Vijayakumar himself was a party to the agreement for sale he sought to produce, he could have submitted it during his evidence phase, and that he had already cross-examined the complainant about the agreement, making reopening unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.M.P.No.76 of 2026 Court Decision: The petition was dismissed. The Karaikudi Fast Track Court rejected accused Vijayakumar's request to reopen the complainant's evidence in a cheque dishonour case (₹5,00,000 under Negotiable Instruments Act). The court found the petition was filed belatedly and without sufficient reason, noting that Vijayakumar had been given multiple opportunities to present his defence evidence (11.12.2025, 03.01.2026, 22.01.2026, 05.02.2026) but failed to utilize them. The court ruled that since Vijayakumar himself was a party to the agreement for sale he sought to produce, he could have submitted it during his evidence phase, and that he had already cross-examined the complainant about the agreement, making reopening unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case