DR.C.SURESH vs S.NIRMALA — 72/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV120000932026

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

72/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR.C.SURESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.NIRMALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    IA orderView PDF

    Summary of Case 72/2026: The Fast Track Court at Karaikudi allowed Dr. C. Suresh's petition under Section 311 CrPC to recall PW1 (Prosecution Witness 1) for cross-examination. The court found that the accused had been given an opportunity to cross-examine PW1 but had failed to do so, and determined that denying this petition would cause injustice to the accused. The court directed the accused to cross-examine PW1 on their next appearance, limited to Exhibits P6-P7, without further adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  4. 06-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 72/2026: The Fast Track Court at Karaikudi allowed Dr. C. Suresh's petition under Section 311 CrPC to recall PW1 (Prosecution Witness 1) for cross-examination. The court found that the accused had been given an opportunity to cross-examine PW1 but had failed to do so, and determined that denying this petition would cause injustice to the accused. The court directed the accused to cross-examine PW1 on their next appearance, limited to Exhibits P6-P7, without further adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case