DR.C.SURESH vs S NIRMALA — 71/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSV120000922026

Filing Number

92/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

71/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Karaikudi

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 311

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR.C.SURESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S NIRMALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    IA orderView PDF

    Summary: The Fast Track Court at Karaikudi allowed Dr. C. Suresh's petition under Section 311 CrPC to recall and cross-examine PW1 (the complainant S. Nirmala's witness), whom he had previously failed to cross-examine. The court found that denying the petition would cause injustice to the accused and compromise his right to substantiate his defense. The court directed the accused to cross-examine PW1 on the witness's next appearance, limited to exhibits P6 to P7, without further adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  4. 06-May-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate (Ftc ML), Karaikudi

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Fast Track Court at Karaikudi allowed Dr. C. Suresh's petition under Section 311 CrPC to recall and cross-examine PW1 (the complainant S. Nirmala's witness), whom he had previously failed to cross-examine. The court found that denying the petition would cause injustice to the accused and compromise his right to substantiate his defense. The court directed the accused to cross-examine PW1 on the witness's next appearance, limited to exhibits P6 to P7, without further adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case