Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption vs C. Meenakshisundaram — 1000073/2014
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7,13(2),13(1)(d). Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 10th April 2026.
SPLCC - Special Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV100000422014
Filing Number
1000073/2014
Filing Date
17-02-2014
Registration No
1000073/2014
Registration Date
17-02-2014
Court
Special Court for trial of cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Judge
10-Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption
Adv. Deputy Legal Advisor
Respondent(s)
C. Meenakshisundaram
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Court allowed C. Meenakshisundaram's petition seeking suspension of his sentence under Section 389(3) CrPC. Meenakshisundaram, a Junior Engineer at TNEB, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000. The court suspended the sentence for 30 days (10.04.2026 to 09.05.2026) to enable him to file an appeal before the Madras High Court, subject to furnishing two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Special Court allowed C. Meenakshisundaram's petition seeking suspension of his sentence under Section 389(3) CrPC. Meenakshisundaram, a Junior Engineer at TNEB, was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000. The court suspended the sentence for 30 days (10.04.2026 to 09.05.2026) to enable him to file an appeal before the Madras High Court, subject to furnishing two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts