State Government vs Alagu — 1/2026
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 167,409,468,471,477A,13(2),13(1)(c)and(d). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 10th March 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNSV100000022026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
Special Court for trial of cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Judge
10-Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
2
Police Station
Vigilance and Anti Corruption Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. DSP vigilance and anti corruption
Respondent(s)
Alagu
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service | |
| 23-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Judge closed FIR No. 02/2020 against hostel warden P. Azhagu as "Action Dropped," finding insufficient evidence to sustain criminal charges under IPC sections 167, 409, 468, 471, 477-A and Prevention of Corruption Act despite allegations of misappropriating ₹74,840 in government funds through falsified records. The court accepted the investigation officer's recommendation and government order directing departmental proceedings through a Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings instead of criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Judge closed FIR No. 02/2020 against hostel warden P. Azhagu as "Action Dropped," finding insufficient evidence to sustain criminal charges under IPC sections 167, 409, 468, 471, 477-A and Prevention of Corruption Act despite allegations of misappropriating ₹74,840 in government funds through falsified records. The court accepted the investigation officer's recommendation and government order directing departmental proceedings through a Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings instead of criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts