State Government vs Alagu — 1/2026
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 167,409,468,471,477A,13(2),13(1)(c)and(d). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 10th March 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNSV100000022026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Special Court for trial of cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Judge
10-Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Last updated 09-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
2
Police Station
Vigilance and Anti Corruption Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. DSP vigilance and anti corruption
Respondent(s)
-
1.Alagu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Plaint/Petition/Appealmemo
Summary The Special Judge closed FIR No. 02/2020 against hostel warden P. Azhagu as "Action Dropped," finding insufficient evidence to sustain criminal charges under IPC sections 167, 409, 468, 471, 477-A and Prevention of Corruption Act despite allegations of misappropriating ₹74,840 in government funds through falsified records. The court accepted the investigation officer's recommendation and government order directing departmental proceedings through a Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings instead of criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
-
09-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Special Judge , Special Court For Trial Of Cases Under Prevention Of Corruption Act, Sivagangai
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2026
Summary The Special Judge closed FIR No. 02/2020 against hostel warden P. Azhagu as "Action Dropped," finding insufficient evidence to sustain criminal charges under IPC sections 167, 409, 468, 471, 477-A and Prevention of Corruption Act despite allegations of misappropriating ₹74,840 in government funds through falsified records. The court accepted the investigation officer's recommendation and government order directing departmental proceedings through a Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings instead of criminal prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts