Manickam vs P. Raman Advocate - Mr. V. Agniraj — 100086/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV080000912018
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100086/2018
Filing Date
13-08-2018
Registration No
100086/2018
Registration Date
13-08-2018
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manickam
Adv. M.Ganesan
Respondent(s)
P. Raman Advocate - Mr. V. Agniraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
For further Proceedings
Orders
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | For further Proceedings | |
| 09-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 02-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court at Manamadurai allowed an application (IA No. 8/2025) under CPC Section 151 to re-open a closed case (OS No. 86/2018) dated November 21, 2025. The petitioner sought to re-open proceedings to cross-examine witnesses (PW1 and PW2) after the first defendant died during pendency of the suit, and a default judgment was passed against the petitioner's heirs. The court permitted re-opening based on the principle of natural justice ("Audi alteram partem") to allow fair hearing. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court at Manamadurai allowed an application (IA No. 8/2025) under CPC Section 151 to re-open a closed case (OS No. 86/2018) dated November 21, 2025. The petitioner sought to re-open proceedings to cross-examine witnesses (PW1 and PW2) after the first defendant died during pendency of the suit, and a default judgment was passed against the petitioner's heirs. The court permitted re-opening based on the principle of natural justice ("Audi alteram partem") to allow fair hearing. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts