Parameshwari vs Muthumari — 49/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section order 7,rule 1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV080000792024
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
91/2024
Filing Date
26-07-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parameshwari
Adv. A.Karuppiah
Respondent(s)
Muthumari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 26-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 17-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In OS No.49/2024 before the District Munsif, Manamadurai, the court dismissed the partition suit on the grounds that a necessary party (Sulochana, daughter of Muthu Acharya) who actually resides in the property was not made a party to the case. The court held that without including the actual occupant as a defendant, the plaintiff cannot obtain the relief sought in the partition proceedings. Cross-examination of PW1 (Parameswari) concluded on 06.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In OS No.49/2024 before the District Munsif, Manamadurai, the court dismissed the partition suit on the grounds that a necessary party (Sulochana, daughter of Muthu Acharya) who actually resides in the property was not made a party to the case. The court held that without including the actual occupant as a defendant, the plaintiff cannot obtain the relief sought in the partition proceedings. Cross-examination of PW1 (Parameswari) concluded on 06.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts