Sri Arumugaswamigal madam, through manager R.Loganathan vs R.Sankaranarayannan Advocate - Aijaypriyan — 65/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 43(2),22,44. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSV080000732022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

105/2022

Filing Date

03-11-2022

Registration No

65/2022

Registration Date

03-11-2022

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 43(2),22,44

Petitioner(s)

Sri Arumugaswamigal madam, through manager R.Loganathan

Adv. S.Parthasarathy

Respondent(s)

R.Sankaranarayannan Advocate - Aijaypriyan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

24-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

15-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

07-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

30-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

12-01-2026
Copy of deposition

Summary: In case O.S.65/2022 before the District Munsif Court, Manamadurai (dated January 12, 2026), the court recorded the examination-in-chief testimony of the plaintiff's witness (Loganathan) under Section 44(6) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1869. The witness acknowledged his written statement after it was read over and interpreted to him in Tamil. The case was adjourned to a later date for marking of documents as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In case O.S.65/2022 before the District Munsif Court, Manamadurai (dated January 12, 2026), the court recorded the examination-in-chief testimony of the plaintiff's witness (Loganathan) under Section 44(6) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1869. The witness acknowledged his written statement after it was read over and interpreted to him in Tamil. The case was adjourned to a later date for marking of documents as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case