Alamelu vs Ameethabanu — 2/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21(2)(a). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNSV080000242023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
30/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
2/2023
Registration Date
13-04-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alamelu
Adv. S.Elangovan
Respondent(s)
Ameethabanu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 24-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 21-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 20-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Alamelu v. Ameethabanu (2/2023) This is a property dispute case involving competing claims to inherited property. Petitioner Alamelu claims ancestral property rights through her grandmother's will and subsequent partition deed dated 06.04.2005, while also asserting rights through a partition deed dated 12.02.2020 executed by her husband's successors. Respondent Ameethabanu has been in possession of the property since 2009 under an alleged oral agreement. The court examined Alamelu's witness testimony on 17.03.2026, finding critical inconsistencies: she failed to produce revenue documents supporting ancestral ownership claims, could not produce the grandmother's will document, and provided conflicting accounts regarding when possession agreements were made (claiming both 12.10.2010 and later dates). The court rejected Alamelu's petition, holding that without proper documentary evidence of ownership and given Ameethabanu's long possession since 2009, Alamelu lacks sufficient grounds for relief under civil law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Alamelu v. Ameethabanu (2/2023) This is a property dispute case involving competing claims to inherited property. Petitioner Alamelu claims ancestral property rights through her grandmother's will and subsequent partition deed dated 06.04.2005, while also asserting rights through a partition deed dated 12.02.2020 executed by her husband's successors. Respondent Ameethabanu has been in possession of the property since 2009 under an alleged oral agreement. The court examined Alamelu's witness testimony on 17.03.2026, finding critical inconsistencies: she failed to produce revenue documents supporting ancestral ownership claims, could not produce the grandmother's will document, and provided conflicting accounts regarding when possession agreements were made (claiming both 12.10.2010 and later dates). The court rejected Alamelu's petition, holding that without proper documentary evidence of ownership and given Ameethabanu's long possession since 2009, Alamelu lacks sufficient grounds for relief under civil law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts