Peliks Sagayaraj vs Rabart Kulathainathan — 21/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(a), 27(c). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV080000222021
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
30/2021
Filing Date
22-03-2021
Registration No
21/2021
Registration Date
22-03-2021
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Peliks Sagayaraj
Adv. S. Rajasekaran
Soosai
Adv. Tr.S.Rajasekaran
Johnbrito praveen
Adv. Tr.S.Rajasekaran
Dennisraj
Adv. Tr.S.Rajasekaran
Respondent(s)
Rabart Kulathainathan
Sesiliya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 26-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 21/2021 Outcome: The petition filed by Peliks Sagayaraj, Soosai, and Johnbrito Praveen was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for them to file a counter-case against the respondents (Rabart Kulathainathan and Sesiliya) regarding a land dispute. The court found the petitioners' arguments sufficient and upheld the revenue authority's order recognizing their rights to the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 21/2021 Outcome: The petition filed by Peliks Sagayaraj, Soosai, and Johnbrito Praveen was ALLOWED. The court granted permission for them to file a counter-case against the respondents (Rabart Kulathainathan and Sesiliya) regarding a land dispute. The court found the petitioners' arguments sufficient and upheld the revenue authority's order recognizing their rights to the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts