Alamelu vs Ameethabanu — 1/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21(2)(a). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNSV080000162023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
22/2023
Filing Date
08-03-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
08-03-2023
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Alamelu
Adv. S.Elangovan
Respondent(s)
Ameethabanu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 24-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 21-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 20-04-2026 | Enquiry |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RLTOP No.1/2023 (Alamelu v. Ameethabanu) Hearing Date: 17.03.2026 This is a land dispute case involving a property rental agreement. Petitioner Alamelu testified regarding a verbal rental agreement entered into on 17.10.2022 with respondent Ameethabanu for an advance of ₹60,000 and monthly rent of ₹4,000. Alamelu claims rental payments have not been made since 2022 and seeks recovery of the advance and restoration of the property. The court examined discrepancies in Alamelu's statements regarding when the verbal agreement was formed (2010 vs. 2022) and noted that a registered partition deed dated 06.04.2005 and a partition release deed dated 12.02.2020 formed the basis for property rights. The cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in Alamelu's testimony regarding documentation and registration of the rental agreement. No final order was issued; cross-examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RLTOP No.1/2023 (Alamelu v. Ameethabanu) Hearing Date: 17.03.2026 This is a land dispute case involving a property rental agreement. Petitioner Alamelu testified regarding a verbal rental agreement entered into on 17.10.2022 with respondent Ameethabanu for an advance of ₹60,000 and monthly rent of ₹4,000. Alamelu claims rental payments have not been made since 2022 and seeks recovery of the advance and restoration of the property. The court examined discrepancies in Alamelu's statements regarding when the verbal agreement was formed (2010 vs. 2022) and noted that a registered partition deed dated 06.04.2005 and a partition release deed dated 12.02.2020 formed the basis for property rights. The cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in Alamelu's testimony regarding documentation and registration of the rental agreement. No final order was issued; cross-examination concluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts