Jothimani vs Servaran Advocate - Tr.M. Veerapandi for D1 to D3. — 10/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV080000102021
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
15/2021
Filing Date
16-02-2021
Registration No
10/2021
Registration Date
16-02-2021
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jothimani
Adv. Tr.R.Somanathan, Tr.S.Elangovan
Respondent(s)
Servaran Advocate - Tr.M. Veerapandi for D1 to D3.
Kaaliammal
Adv. Tr.M. Veerapandi for D1 to D3.
Muthuselvam
Adv. Tr.M. Veerapandi for D1 to D3.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Trial
Trial
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Trial |
| 02-04-2026 | Trial |
| 12-03-2026 | Issues |
| 04-03-2026 | Issues |
| 20-02-2026 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Jothimani v. Servaran Advocate & Others (OS 10/2021) Outcome: The petition is admitted/allowed for further proceedings. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding disputed property ownership documents to have sufficient merit to proceed to trial, rejecting the respondents' preliminary objections on limitation and title grounds. Key Finding: The court determined that four sale deed documents (dated 1965, 1968, 1973, and 1978) require substantive examination to determine their validity and the rightful owner of the disputed property, and that necessary parties must be brought before the court to resolve the property title dispute conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Jothimani v. Servaran Advocate & Others (OS 10/2021) Outcome: The petition is admitted/allowed for further proceedings. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding disputed property ownership documents to have sufficient merit to proceed to trial, rejecting the respondents' preliminary objections on limitation and title grounds. Key Finding: The court determined that four sale deed documents (dated 1965, 1968, 1973, and 1978) require substantive examination to determine their validity and the rightful owner of the disputed property, and that necessary parties must be brought before the court to resolve the property title dispute conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts