Kanchivanam vs Santhi — 2/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Amendment Next hearing 04-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSV080000022025

Filing Number

2/2025

Filing Date

04-Jan-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

04-Jan-2025

Court

Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kanchivanam

    Adv. VALMEEGANATHAN.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santhi

  2. 2.Pandi muthu

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  14. 29-Oct-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  16. 20-Sep-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  19. 31-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  20. 11-Jul-2025

    IA orderView PDF

  21. 11-Jul-2025

    IA orderView PDF

  22. 11-Jul-2025

    IA orderView PDF

  23. 11-Jul-2025

    IA orderView PDF

    The petition/interim application is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for interim relief under the CPC. The disputed property agreement lacked proper stamp duty documentation, and the plaintiff could not prove entitlement to the 20-year lease arrangement with adequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 11-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 07-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  26. 21-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  27. 11-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  28. 04-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  29. 28-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  30. 15-Apr-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  31. 27-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  32. 06-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  33. 28-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  34. 30-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  35. 04-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 04-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The petition/interim application is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for interim relief under the CPC. The disputed property agreement lacked proper stamp duty documentation, and the plaintiff could not prove entitlement to the 20-year lease arrangement with adequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case