Kanchivanam vs Santhi — 2/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7,R.1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV080000022025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2/2025
Filing Date
04-01-2025
Registration No
2/2025
Registration Date
04-01-2025
Court
Principal District Munsif Court, Manamadurai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kanchivanam
Adv. VALMEEGANATHAN.S
Respondent(s)
Santhi
Pandi muthu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Amendment
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 18-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 04-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 24-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
The petition/interim application is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for interim relief under the CPC. The disputed property agreement lacked proper stamp duty documentation, and the plaintiff could not prove entitlement to the 20-year lease arrangement with adequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition/interim application is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for interim relief under the CPC. The disputed property agreement lacked proper stamp duty documentation, and the plaintiff could not prove entitlement to the 20-year lease arrangement with adequate evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts