SI OF POLICE, DVK TALUK PS. CR.NO.108-2025. vs SUGUNTHAAN — 68/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV070013732025
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
e-Filing Number
01-04-2025
Filing Number
1366/2025
Filing Date
12-04-2025
Registration No
68/2025
Registration Date
29-04-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
Devakottai Taluk Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI OF POLICE, DVK TALUK PS (Police Station). CR.NO.108-2025.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SUGUNTHAAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant | |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This document records witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 68/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakottai. Two police constables testified that on 26.03.2025, they apprehended an accused named Sukunthan near Vadakizhkudi bus stop with five 180ml bottles of Express brand liquor intended for sale, which were seized and documented. The witnesses' testimonies were recorded under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, with cross-examination conducted and their statements transcribed and affirmed as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This document records witness depositions in Criminal Case No. 68/2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakottai. Two police constables testified that on 26.03.2025, they apprehended an accused named Sukunthan near Vadakizhkudi bus stop with five 180ml bottles of Express brand liquor intended for sale, which were seized and documented. The witnesses' testimonies were recorded under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, with cross-examination conducted and their statements transcribed and affirmed as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts