Veerappa Chettiyar vs Kamal@Kamalakasan and one another — 300097/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,506(1). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 02-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV070010772018

Filing Number

300097/2018

Filing Date

01-Aug-2018

Registration No

300097/2018

Registration Date

01-Aug-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 09-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,506(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Veerappa Chettiyar

    Adv. Periyasamy K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kamal@Kamalakasan and one another

Case History

  1. 02-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 04-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 22-Oct-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 17-Sep-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 01-Sep-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 20-Aug-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  27. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  30. 17-Jun-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed the petition (CRL RP 97/2018) dated 17.06.2025. The petitioner challenged an assault case registered under Section 317 IPC, claiming the injuries were not caused by the opposite party but resulted from the petitioner's own fall. The court found the petitioner's arguments unconvincing and rejected the petition, noting insufficient evidence to support the claim of no causal connection between the opposite party's actions and the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  31. 17-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 05-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 14-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  35. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  36. 02-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  37. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  38. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  39. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  40. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  41. 14-Aug-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  42. 24-Jul-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  43. 02-Jul-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  44. 10-Jun-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  45. 15-May-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  46. 30-Apr-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  47. 21-Mar-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  48. 26-Feb-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate

  49. 30-Jan-2024

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  50. 01-Dec-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  51. 15-Nov-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  52. 19-Oct-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  53. 08-Sep-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  54. 14-Aug-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate

  55. 14-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  56. 19-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  57. 16-May-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  58. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  59. 31-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  60. 16-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  61. 10-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  62. 02-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  63. 17-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  64. 28-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  65. 26-Sep-2022

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  66. 26-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  67. 06-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  68. 02-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  69. 12-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  70. 20-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  71. 31-May-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  72. 06-May-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  73. 11-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  74. 11-Mar-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  75. 11-Feb-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  76. 11-Jan-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  77. 09-Dec-2021

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  78. 07-Dec-2021

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  79. 15-Nov-2021

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate

  80. 06-Oct-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  81. 06-Sep-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  82. 26-Jul-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  83. 16-Jun-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  84. 28-Apr-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  85. 24-Mar-2021

    Issue of Process

    Judicial Magistrate

  86. 28-Dec-2020

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  87. 20-Nov-2020

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate

  88. 28-Sep-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  89. 12-Aug-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  90. 29-Jun-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  91. 18-May-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  92. 29-Apr-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  93. 02-Mar-2020

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate

  94. 30-Jan-2020

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  95. 16-Dec-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  96. 21-Oct-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  97. 24-Sep-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  98. 30-Aug-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  99. 15-May-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  100. 14-Mar-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  101. 06-Feb-2019

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  102. 05-Dec-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  103. 24-Oct-2018

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  104. 05-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  105. 01-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300097/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the petition (CRL RP 97/2018) dated 17.06.2025. The petitioner challenged an assault case registered under Section 317 IPC, claiming the injuries were not caused by the opposite party but resulted from the petitioner's own fall. The court found the petitioner's arguments unconvincing and rejected the petition, noting insufficient evidence to support the claim of no causal connection between the opposite party's actions and the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case