Veerappa Chettiyar vs Kamal@Kamalakasan and one another — 300097/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,506(1). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSV070010772018

Appearance

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

300097/2018

Filing Date

01-08-2018

Registration No

300097/2018

Registration Date

01-08-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 341,294(b),324,506(1)
MP/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/3/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/4/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/5/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/6/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/7/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/8/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/10/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/11/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/12/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/13/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/14/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/15/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/16/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/17/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/18/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/19/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/20/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/21/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/22/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/23/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/26/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.PC Section Veerappa ChettiyarKamal@Kamalakasan and one another
MP/27/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar
MP/28/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Kamal@Kamalakasan and one anotherVeerappa Chettiyar

Petitioner(s)

Veerappa Chettiyar

Adv. Periyasamy K

Respondent(s)

Kamal@Kamalakasan and one another

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate

07-05-2026

Appearance

15-04-2026

Appearance

26-03-2026

Appearance

10-03-2026

Appearance

24-02-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

17-06-2025
Copy of deposition

Summary: The court dismissed the petition (CRL RP 97/2018) dated 17.06.2025. The petitioner challenged an assault case registered under Section 317 IPC, claiming the injuries were not caused by the opposite party but resulted from the petitioner's own fall. The court found the petitioner's arguments unconvincing and rejected the petition, noting insufficient evidence to support the claim of no causal connection between the opposite party's actions and the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the petition (CRL RP 97/2018) dated 17.06.2025. The petitioner challenged an assault case registered under Section 317 IPC, claiming the injuries were not caused by the opposite party but resulted from the petitioner's own fall. The court found the petitioner's arguments unconvincing and rejected the petition, noting insufficient evidence to support the claim of no causal connection between the opposite party's actions and the injuries sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case