SI.of.P.S, Aravayal PS. vs Sabari Advocate - Mr.KR.Thiruppathi — 300177/2017
Case under Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SabariSI.of.P.S, Aravayal PS. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV070007352017
Filing Number
300177/2017
Filing Date
11-10-2017
Registration No
300177/2017
Registration Date
11-10-2017
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI.of.P.S, Aravayal PS (Police Station).
Adv. APP Gr.II
Respondent(s)
Sabari Advocate - Mr.KR.Thiruppathi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 300177/2017 The court acquitted the defendant (Sabari) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 323, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant's testimony (witness A.W.7) was corroborated by medical evidence of injuries, the absence of credible eyewitness accounts and the defendant's denial of involvement resulted in insufficient evidence to establish guilt. The court noted inconsistencies in the prosecution case and discharged the defendant under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 300177/2017 The court acquitted the defendant (Sabari) of charges under IPC Sections 341, 294(b), 323, and 506(2), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant's testimony (witness A.W.7) was corroborated by medical evidence of injuries, the absence of credible eyewitness accounts and the defendant's denial of involvement resulted in insufficient evidence to establish guilt. The court noted inconsistencies in the prosecution case and discharged the defendant under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts