Priya vs Paramasivam Advocate - Mr.R.Rajiv Gandhi — 4/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

MC - Maintenance Case

CNR: TNSV070004762022

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

476/2022

Filing Date

31-03-2022

Registration No

4/2022

Registration Date

31-03-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 126 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 126 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/3/2024 Classification : 126 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/4/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/5/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section PriyaParamasivam
Mp/6/2024 Classification : 126 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/7/2024 Classification : 126 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/8/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section ParamasivamPriya

Petitioner(s)

Priya

Adv. Mr. M. Periyasamy, B.A., B.L.,

Shanthini

Mahadevi

Respondent(s)

Paramasivam Advocate - Mr.R.Rajiv Gandhi

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate

13-05-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

28-01-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-11-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

27-02-2024
Copy of deposition

Case 4/2022 Summary Petitioners: Priya, Shanthini, and Mahadevi Respondent: Paramasivam Advocate (Mr. R. Rajiv Gandhi) Date: 27.02.2024 The petition, concerning a matrimonial dispute, was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claims regarding separation, maintenance, and allegations against the first husband lacked merit. The petitioner admitted to living separately for two years after initially reconciling, and the court determined there was insufficient grounds to support the relief sought regarding maintenance or other claims against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 4/2022 Summary Petitioners: Priya, Shanthini, and Mahadevi Respondent: Paramasivam Advocate (Mr. R. Rajiv Gandhi) Date: 27.02.2024 The petition, concerning a matrimonial dispute, was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claims regarding separation, maintenance, and allegations against the first husband lacked merit. The petitioner admitted to living separately for two years after initially reconciling, and the court determined there was insufficient grounds to support the relief sought regarding maintenance or other claims against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case