Sivaranjani vs Devakottai taluk PS — 166/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSV070003232026
Filing Number
322/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
166/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
315
Police Station
Devakottai Taluk Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivaranjani
Adv. BAHAMPRIYAL
Respondent(s)
Devakottai taluk PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Service Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sivaranjani v. Devakottai Taluk PS (166/2026) The Judicial Magistrate granted conditional bail to petitioner Sivaranjani, wife of vehicle owner Azhaippan, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 497 and 503 (relating to a two-wheeler, Hero Splender Plus, TN 63 AS 5451). The court found that Sivaranjani is the legitimate wife of the vehicle owner, the vehicle is held in his name, and considering the nature of the case and circumstances, bail conditions were appropriate including a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, submission of vehicle registration certificate, and production of the vehicle when court requires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sivaranjani v. Devakottai Taluk PS (166/2026) The Judicial Magistrate granted conditional bail to petitioner Sivaranjani, wife of vehicle owner Azhaippan, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 497 and 503 (relating to a two-wheeler, Hero Splender Plus, TN 63 AS 5451). The court found that Sivaranjani is the legitimate wife of the vehicle owner, the vehicle is held in his name, and considering the nature of the case and circumstances, bail conditions were appropriate including a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, submission of vehicle registration certificate, and production of the vehicle when court requires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts