Inspector of Police vs Mariyadhas — 13/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSV070000202019
Filing Number
20/2019
Filing Date
05-Jan-2019
Registration No
13/2019
Registration Date
08-Jan-2019
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Devakkottai
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
Devakottai Town Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mariyadhas
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 13/2019 Court Decision: The Sessions Court acquitted the respondent Mariyadhas of charges under IPC Section 304-A (causing death by negligence). The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite evidence of a fatal traffic collision. Key Facts: On July 16, 2018, Pannirselvam died in a road accident involving two vehicles (truck TN 63 Y 4979 and two-wheeler TN 55 Z 2486). The prosecution alleged the truck driver (respondent) was negligent and rash. However, the court found that key witness testimony was inconsistent, the victim's identity as the two-wheeler driver was not definitively established through proper testimony, and the prosecution failed to adequately prove negligence beyond doubt. Reasoning: While circumstantial evidence suggested rash driving by the respondent, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case—including the absence of crucial eyewitness testimony and insufficient proof of the accident circumstances—making it impossible to establish guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-May-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-May-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2024
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Aug-2023
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
03-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Oct-2022
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
19-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jul-2022
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
22-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2022
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jun-2022
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-May-2022
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jan-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Aug-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-May-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2021
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Dec-2020
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2020
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Nov-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Sep-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jun-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-May-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2020
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-May-2019
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Mar-2019
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2019
Case Summary: S.T.C. No. 13/2019 Court Decision: The Sessions Court acquitted the respondent Mariyadhas of charges under IPC Section 304-A (causing death by negligence). The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt despite evidence of a fatal traffic collision. Key Facts: On July 16, 2018, Pannirselvam died in a road accident involving two vehicles (truck TN 63 Y 4979 and two-wheeler TN 55 Z 2486). The prosecution alleged the truck driver (respondent) was negligent and rash. However, the court found that key witness testimony was inconsistent, the victim's identity as the two-wheeler driver was not definitively established through proper testimony, and the prosecution failed to adequately prove negligence beyond doubt. Reasoning: While circumstantial evidence suggested rash driving by the respondent, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case—including the absence of crucial eyewitness testimony and insufficient proof of the accident circumstances—making it impossible to establish guilt with certainty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts