Murugesan vs Selvi @ Seethalakshmi — 200141/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Publication. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNSV060001442013

Publication

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

200141/2013

Filing Date

28-11-2013

Registration No

200141/2013

Registration Date

28-11-2013

Court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

Murugesan

Adv. Mr.N.Sekar

Respondent(s)

Selvi @ Seethalakshmi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

27-04-2026

Publication

21-04-2026

Steps

17-04-2026

Steps

01-04-2026

Issue of Service

27-03-2026

Batta

Interim Orders

20-04-2022
Plaint/Petition/Appealmemo

Case Summary: Murugesan v. Selvi @ Seethalakshmi (O.S. 141/2013) Outcome: Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. The District Munsif rejected the petitioner's application to condone the delay in producing medical documents (MRI, lab reports, medication lists from 2020-2021). While acknowledging that procedural technicalities should not obstruct justice, the court found the medical evidence unreliable—the issuing doctor had died recently, MRI results appeared normal contradicting the plaintiff's paralysis claims, and no credible documentary proof substantiated the alleged acute medical illness preventing court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Murugesan v. Selvi @ Seethalakshmi (O.S. 141/2013) Outcome: Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. The District Munsif rejected the petitioner's application to condone the delay in producing medical documents (MRI, lab reports, medication lists from 2020-2021). While acknowledging that procedural technicalities should not obstruct justice, the court found the medical evidence unreliable—the issuing doctor had died recently, MRI results appeared normal contradicting the plaintiff's paralysis claims, and no credible documentary proof substantiated the alleged acute medical illness preventing court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case