Ampurose vs Pandi — 100/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060001172023
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
157/2023
Filing Date
01-12-2023
Registration No
100/2023
Registration Date
01-12-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ampurose
Adv. Mr.K.Periyasamy
Arockiyasamy
Adv. Mr.K.Periyasamy
Respondent(s)
Pandi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Trial
Trial
Trial
Issues
Lok Adalat
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Trial |
| 15-04-2026 | Trial |
| 25-03-2026 | Trial |
| 14-03-2026 | Issues |
| 12-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: IA.100/2023 (Ampurose & Arockiyasamy v. Pandi) The District Munsif Court, Devakottai granted a temporary injunction petition filed by Ampurose and Arockiyasamy against Pandi on February 12, 2026. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with their possession of agricultural property (survey number 350, 90 cents) in Meyappanenthal village, which they claimed their father purchased via registered sale deed dated May 23, 1973. The court found the petitioners established prima facie ownership based on the registered sale deed, which takes precedence over the respondent's revenue documents and SLR copies. Accordingly, the court restrained the respondent from disturbing the petitioners' peaceful possession until final disposal of the suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: IA.100/2023 (Ampurose & Arockiyasamy v. Pandi) The District Munsif Court, Devakottai granted a temporary injunction petition filed by Ampurose and Arockiyasamy against Pandi on February 12, 2026. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with their possession of agricultural property (survey number 350, 90 cents) in Meyappanenthal village, which they claimed their father purchased via registered sale deed dated May 23, 1973. The court found the petitioners established prima facie ownership based on the registered sale deed, which takes precedence over the respondent's revenue documents and SLR copies. Accordingly, the court restrained the respondent from disturbing the petitioners' peaceful possession until final disposal of the suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts