Ampurose vs Pandi — 100/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060001172023
Filing Number
157/2023
Filing Date
01-Dec-2023
Registration No
100/2023
Registration Date
01-Dec-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ampurose
Adv. Mr.K.Periyasamy
-
2.Arockiyasamy
Adv. Mr.K.Periyasamy
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pandi
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
15-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
25-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
14-Mar-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
12-Feb-2026
IA orderView PDF
Case Summary: IA.100/2023 (Ampurose & Arockiyasamy v. Pandi) The District Munsif Court, Devakottai granted a temporary injunction petition filed by Ampurose and Arockiyasamy against Pandi on February 12, 2026. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with their possession of agricultural property (survey number 350, 90 cents) in Meyappanenthal village, which they claimed their father purchased via registered sale deed dated May 23, 1973. The court found the petitioners established prima facie ownership based on the registered sale deed, which takes precedence over the respondent's revenue documents and SLR copies. Accordingly, the court restrained the respondent from disturbing the petitioners' peaceful possession until final disposal of the suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif
-
05-Feb-2026
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
23-Jan-2026
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
06-Jan-2026
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
21-Nov-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
30-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Oct-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
26-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
15-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
09-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
09-Apr-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
01-Mar-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
22-Jan-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
14-Sep-2024
Issues
District Munsif
-
14-Aug-2024
Lok Adalat
District Munsif
-
15-Jul-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
27-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
08-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
22-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2023
Case Summary: IA.100/2023 (Ampurose & Arockiyasamy v. Pandi) The District Munsif Court, Devakottai granted a temporary injunction petition filed by Ampurose and Arockiyasamy against Pandi on February 12, 2026. The petitioners sought to restrain the respondent from interfering with their possession of agricultural property (survey number 350, 90 cents) in Meyappanenthal village, which they claimed their father purchased via registered sale deed dated May 23, 1973. The court found the petitioners established prima facie ownership based on the registered sale deed, which takes precedence over the respondent's revenue documents and SLR copies. Accordingly, the court restrained the respondent from disturbing the petitioners' peaceful possession until final disposal of the suit, with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts