Kulandairaj and four others. vs Sornam and 5 others. — 200120/2012

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNSV060001172012

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200120/2012

Filing Date

29-11-2012

Registration No

200120/2012

Registration Date

29-11-2012

Court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Order 7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

Kulandairaj and four others.

Adv. Mr.D.Panneerselvam

Respondent(s)

Sornam and 5 others.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

28-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

21-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

10-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

26-02-2026
Copy of deposition

Summary Case No.: A.V. 120/2012 | Date: 26.02.2026 This is a property dispute case (likely concerning land/property rights) heard in a Tamil Nadu court. The court examined witness testimony regarding disputed land property, survey numbers, ownership records, and historical documents spanning from 1918-1977. The court found the plaintiff's witness testimony credible on key issues including property boundaries, ancestral ownership, and documentary evidence. The case was ordered for further proceedings with the court noting that both parties' claims require continued adjudication based on the recorded evidence and documentary submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case No.: A.V. 120/2012 | Date: 26.02.2026 This is a property dispute case (likely concerning land/property rights) heard in a Tamil Nadu court. The court examined witness testimony regarding disputed land property, survey numbers, ownership records, and historical documents spanning from 1918-1977. The court found the plaintiff's witness testimony credible on key issues including property boundaries, ancestral ownership, and documentary evidence. The case was ordered for further proceedings with the court noting that both parties' claims require continued adjudication based on the recorded evidence and documentary submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case