N.Nadarajan(Through his Power Agent K.Rajangam) vs M. Malar and 2 others — 92/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(A),27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSV060001072022

Filing Number

136/2022

Filing Date

26-Sep-2022

Registration No

92/2022

Registration Date

26-Sep-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai

Judge

2-District Munsif

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(A),27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.Nadarajan(Through his Power Agent K.Rajangam)

    Adv. Mr. N.Ramji

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M. Malar and 2 others

  2. 2.C.Mahalingam

  3. 3.M.Pazhaniselvam

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 92/2022 Date: 12.03.2026 The court recorded the cross-examination of Witness 1 (Rajangam), the power agent of petitioner N. Nadarajan, in this property dispute case. The witness testified about the disputed "Thawa Saathu" (Survey No. 301/1) property, alleging that respondents illegally encroached by constructing a compound wall measuring 4.6 feet width and 109.5 feet length on the eastern boundary. The witness confirmed the petitioner's 50-year possession, supported the filing in 2020, and provided details about survey records and documentary evidence including photographs. The court examined contested issues regarding western boundary demarcation, the relevance of adjacent survey numbers, and the authenticity of the "Dharai Patta" (revenue document) showing 6.8 acres. No re-examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  16. 21-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  17. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  18. 22-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif

  19. 09-Oct-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  20. 22-Sep-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  21. 15-Sep-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  22. 04-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  23. 25-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  24. 11-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  26. 14-Jul-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  27. 19-Jun-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  28. 29-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  29. 16-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  30. 11-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  31. 27-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif

  32. 19-Dec-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  33. 19-Nov-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  34. 29-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  35. 19-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  36. 20-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  37. 12-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  38. 09-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  39. 12-Aug-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  40. 11-Jul-2024

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  41. 07-Jun-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  42. 08-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  43. 21-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  44. 19-Jan-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif

  45. 11-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  46. 02-Nov-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  47. 29-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  48. 25-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  49. 14-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  50. 13-Jul-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  51. 12-Jun-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  52. 05-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  53. 01-Mar-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  54. 24-Feb-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  55. 22-Feb-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  56. 13-Feb-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  57. 01-Feb-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  58. 09-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  59. 19-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  60. 09-Dec-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  61. 21-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  62. 11-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  63. 27-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 26-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 92/2022 Date: 12.03.2026 The court recorded the cross-examination of Witness 1 (Rajangam), the power agent of petitioner N. Nadarajan, in this property dispute case. The witness testified about the disputed "Thawa Saathu" (Survey No. 301/1) property, alleging that respondents illegally encroached by constructing a compound wall measuring 4.6 feet width and 109.5 feet length on the eastern boundary. The witness confirmed the petitioner's 50-year possession, supported the filing in 2020, and provided details about survey records and documentary evidence including photographs. The court examined contested issues regarding western boundary demarcation, the relevance of adjacent survey numbers, and the authenticity of the "Dharai Patta" (revenue document) showing 6.8 acres. No re-examination was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case