Karmegam vs Raman — 73/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2). Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000782025
Filing Number
102/2025
Filing Date
03-Sep-2025
Registration No
73/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karmegam
Adv. SIVA.B
-
2.Sumathi
-
3.Rakkammal
-
4.Palanimuthu
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raman
-
2.Karuppayee
-
3.Muthuselvam
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Apr-2026
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
07-Apr-2026
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
30-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
District Munsif
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 73/2025) from the District Court in Tamil Nadu. The court examined the plaintiff's evidence on March 10, 2026, where the plaintiff (as the second witness) testified and submitted documentary evidence. The defendant did not appear but no cross-examination was conducted. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Munsif
-
24-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
21-Jan-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
15-Dec-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
25-Nov-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
07-Nov-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Oct-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2025
This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 73/2025) from the District Court in Tamil Nadu. The court examined the plaintiff's evidence on March 10, 2026, where the plaintiff (as the second witness) testified and submitted documentary evidence. The defendant did not appear but no cross-examination was conducted. The case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts