Bhuvaneshwari alis Selvi vs R. Kalimuthu — 60/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000692024
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
105/2024
Filing Date
22-11-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
13-12-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhuvaneshwari alis Selvi
Adv. DEVA.K
Respondent(s)
R. Kalimuthu
J.Salethmary
Adv. SIVA.B
The Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 02-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 23-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Partly Allowed The District Munsif Court of Devakottai partly allowed the petition filed by Gunasekaran and Marimuthu seeking to be impleaded as 4th and 5th defendants in OS No. 60/2024. The court found that Gunasekaran (1st petitioner) is an essential party to the suit since he forms part of the cause of action—the plaintiff had alleged fraudulent sale deed execution involving him. However, the 2nd petitioner (Marimuthu) was not added as she was only implicated regarding a different property (survey number 49/4B) not part of the main suit. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Partly Allowed The District Munsif Court of Devakottai partly allowed the petition filed by Gunasekaran and Marimuthu seeking to be impleaded as 4th and 5th defendants in OS No. 60/2024. The court found that Gunasekaran (1st petitioner) is an essential party to the suit since he forms part of the cause of action—the plaintiff had alleged fraudulent sale deed execution involving him. However, the 2nd petitioner (Marimuthu) was not added as she was only implicated regarding a different property (survey number 49/4B) not part of the main suit. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts