Meenakshisundaram vs Ramasamy and 2 others — 200052/2016

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(b). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNSV060000562016

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

200056/2016

Filing Date

22-04-2016

Registration No

200052/2016

Registration Date

22-04-2016

Court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai

Judge

2-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

Meenakshisundaram

Adv. Thiru. S.Sornaprakash

Respondent(s)

Ramasamy and 2 others

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif

27-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

21-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

16-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

10-04-2026

Trial

08-04-2026

Batta

Interim Orders

25-03-2026
IA order

Summary The petition filed under Order I Rule 10(2) and Section 151 of CPC to implead the Sub-Registrar of Devakottai as the 16th defendant is allowed with a cost of ₹1,000. The court permitted the addition of the Sub-Registrar as a party to prevent further encumbrances on the suit property and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, while directing the petitioner to conduct the trial effectively without delay. However, the court imposed costs on the petitioner for negligence in not impleading the proposed defendant earlier and for keeping the suit pending for over a decade since its filing in 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed under Order I Rule 10(2) and Section 151 of CPC to implead the Sub-Registrar of Devakottai as the 16th defendant is allowed with a cost of ₹1,000. The court permitted the addition of the Sub-Registrar as a party to prevent further encumbrances on the suit property and avoid multiplicity of proceedings, while directing the petitioner to conduct the trial effectively without delay. However, the court imposed costs on the petitioner for negligence in not impleading the proposed defendant earlier and for keeping the suit pending for over a decade since its filing in 2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Devakkottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case