K.Meenakshi vs The village Administrative officer, Theralappur — 44/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(d), 27(c). Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000542021
Filing Number
88/2021
Filing Date
06-09-2021
Registration No
44/2021
Registration Date
06-09-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Meenakshi
Adv. S.Balasubramanian
K. Manickam
K. Muthusamy
K. Subramanian
K. Palaniyappan
R.Ramu
Lakshmi
Respondent(s)
The village Administrative officer, Theralappur
The Tahshildar
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Devakottai
The District Collector, Sivagangai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 44/2021 The court dismissed the petition filed by K. Meenakshi, K. Manickam, and K. Muthusamy seeking a succession certificate. The petitioner's mother passed away on 13.01.2021 before the case was filed, and the court found that the petitioner failed to include the heirs of his brother Rathnam as necessary parties despite acknowledging they had equal inheritance rights. The court ruled that the petition must be dismissed with the respondents' costs due to non-joinder of essential parties and procedural irregularities in pursuing the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 44/2021 The court dismissed the petition filed by K. Meenakshi, K. Manickam, and K. Muthusamy seeking a succession certificate. The petitioner's mother passed away on 13.01.2021 before the case was filed, and the court found that the petitioner failed to include the heirs of his brother Rathnam as necessary parties despite acknowledging they had equal inheritance rights. The court ruled that the petition must be dismissed with the respondents' costs due to non-joinder of essential parties and procedural irregularities in pursuing the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts