N.Saminathan vs K.Sornam Advocate - Mr.A.S.Chellappa — 38/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000512024
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
75/2024
Filing Date
12-08-2024
Registration No
38/2024
Registration Date
14-08-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Saminathan
Adv. Mr.S.Kumar
Respondent(s)
K.Sornam Advocate - Mr.A.S.Chellappa
S.Pothumponnu
Adv. Mr.A.S.Chellappa
S.Backiyam
Adv. Mr.A.S.Chellappa
M.Kavitha
Adv. Mr.A.S.Chellappa
P.Renuga
Adv. Mr.A.S.Chellappa
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Trial
Trial
Issues
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Trial |
| 06-04-2026 | Trial |
| 23-03-2026 | Issues |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS.No.38/2024 The District Munsif Court, Devakottai allowed a petition filed by defendants K. Sornam, S. Pothum Ponnu, S. Bakyam, M. Kavitha, and P. Renuka seeking to set aside an ex parte order passed against them on 21/10/2024. The defendants had delayed filing their written statement by 222 days, citing efforts to obtain revenue records related to property classifications. The court, applying the principle of "Audi Alteram Partem" (right to be heard), held that every person deserves a reasonable opportunity to present their case before a court. However, considering the significant delay, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to the District Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS.No.38/2024 The District Munsif Court, Devakottai allowed a petition filed by defendants K. Sornam, S. Pothum Ponnu, S. Bakyam, M. Kavitha, and P. Renuka seeking to set aside an ex parte order passed against them on 21/10/2024. The defendants had delayed filing their written statement by 222 days, citing efforts to obtain revenue records related to property classifications. The court, applying the principle of "Audi Alteram Partem" (right to be heard), held that every person deserves a reasonable opportunity to present their case before a court. However, considering the significant delay, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,000 payable to the District Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts