Kasi alias Kasilingam vs Azhagappan — 200042/2017
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 25(d),25(b). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSV060000512017
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
200042/2017
Filing Date
14-06-2017
Registration No
200042/2017
Registration Date
14-06-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kasi alias Kasilingam
Adv. Mr.S.Ganeshbabu
Respondent(s)
Azhagappan
Kumutha
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Trial
Amendment
Amendment
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 16-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 01-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 24-03-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 14-03-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The District Munsif Court at Devakottai allowed the plaintiff's petition to amend the plaint in a civil suit. The plaintiff sought to add a prayer declaring a sale deed executed between the defendants for 2.54 acres on 11/09/2013 as null and void. The court found the amendment to be bonafide and necessary for proper adjudication, citing relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents that amendments should not be refused on hyper-technical grounds when made in good faith. The petition was allowed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The District Munsif Court at Devakottai allowed the plaintiff's petition to amend the plaint in a civil suit. The plaintiff sought to add a prayer declaring a sale deed executed between the defendants for 2.54 acres on 11/09/2013 as null and void. The court found the amendment to be bonafide and necessary for proper adjudication, citing relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents that amendments should not be refused on hyper-technical grounds when made in good faith. The petition was allowed in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts