John Stephen vs Femila — 35/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7 rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000482024
e-Filing Number
03-08-2024
Filing Number
72/2024
Filing Date
06-Aug-2024
Registration No
35/2024
Registration Date
06-Aug-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.John Stephen
Adv. Selvaraj R
Respondent(s)
-
1.Femila
-
2.Reeta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif
-
12-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif
-
26-Feb-2026
Lok Adalat
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif
-
04-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
28-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
03-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif
-
13-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
10-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif
-
01-Dec-2025
Issues
District Munsif
-
20-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
11-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
10-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
25-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
14-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Sep-2025
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2025
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Sep-2025
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
09-Sep-2025
Service Pending
District Munsif
-
29-Aug-2025
Judgement
District Munsif
-
13-Aug-2025
Judgement
District Munsif
-
02-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Munsif
-
11-Jul-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
In O.S. No. 35/2024, the court dismissed the original suit filed under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 for lack of proper documentation and evidence. The plaintiff failed to substantiate the claims with adequate written proof and supporting documents required to establish the contractual dispute. The defendant's objections regarding procedural deficiencies were upheld, resulting in dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Munsif
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Apr-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
29-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
30-Jan-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Dec-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
03-Dec-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
25-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
15-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
14-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
08-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
18-Oct-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
04-Oct-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
19-Sep-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Sep-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
06-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2024
In O.S. No. 35/2024, the court dismissed the original suit filed under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 for lack of proper documentation and evidence. The plaintiff failed to substantiate the claims with adequate written proof and supporting documents required to establish the contractual dispute. The defendant's objections regarding procedural deficiencies were upheld, resulting in dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts