M.Mayazhagu vs Karu.Pariasamy — 200038/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSV060000442017
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
200038/2017
Filing Date
08-06-2017
Registration No
200038/2017
Registration Date
08-06-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.Mayazhagu
Adv. Mr.M.Periasamy
Respondent(s)
Karu.Pariasamy
Asaithambi
The District Collector, Sivagangai.
The Commissioner, Municipality, Devakottai.
The Tahsildar, Devakottai.
Town Surveyor, Devakottai Municipality.
The Sub Collector, Devakottai.
The District Revenue Officer.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 200038/2017 Case: M. Mayazhagu v. Karu. Pariasamy, Asaithambi and The District Collector, Sivagangai Date: 12.03.2026 Outcome: The court examined the second respondent's cross-examination on land property disputes. The petitioner's father had purchased land (T.S. No. 32/1) and the case involves competing claims regarding property ownership and patta (title deed) issuance. The court found conflicting testimonies regarding land transactions, survey divisions, and whether proper documentation existed. The cross-examination of the second respondent was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request, to be continued at a later date. The case involves disputes over ancestral property division and the validity of property transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 200038/2017 Case: M. Mayazhagu v. Karu. Pariasamy, Asaithambi and The District Collector, Sivagangai Date: 12.03.2026 Outcome: The court examined the second respondent's cross-examination on land property disputes. The petitioner's father had purchased land (T.S. No. 32/1) and the case involves competing claims regarding property ownership and patta (title deed) issuance. The court found conflicting testimonies regarding land transactions, survey divisions, and whether proper documentation existed. The cross-examination of the second respondent was adjourned at the respondent's counsel's request, to be continued at a later date. The case involves disputes over ancestral property division and the validity of property transfers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts