S. Ramu vs A.Jeyaraman — 32/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),25(d). Status: Service Pending. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000402021
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
71/2021
Filing Date
20-07-2021
Registration No
32/2021
Registration Date
20-07-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Ramu
Adv. Mr. R.Veerappan
R. Balakrishnan
M. Kannppan
G. Udaiyappan
A. Muneeswaran
Respondent(s)
A.Jeyaraman
G.Pushbammal
D. Jeyalakshmi
Minor. D.Vishal (3rd Defendant themself and Guardian)
Minor.Nandhini(3rd Defendant themselfs Guardian of 4,5 Defendant)
T.Renukadevi
S.Gandhi
S.Usha
V. Gandhimathi
G. Sumathi
V.Vasudevan
V. Sugumaran
M. Kannan
P. Murugesan
The Distric Collector, Sivagangai.
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramnagar, Devakottai
The Tahshildar,Ramnagar, Devakottai.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
Service Pending
Service Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 30-04-2026 | Service Pending |
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 32/2021 Summary Court Order dated 18.03.2026 The court examined the cross-examination of defendants 15-17 regarding a property dispute involving temple land. The petitioners filed the case claiming land measuring 13½ cents (Survey No. 125/114) was purchased for temple construction but was found registered in others' names. The court found the defendants' statements lack merit and dismissed their contentions. The court ruled that the petition should proceed against all defendants and that the case cannot be dismissed based on defendants' arguments. Petition dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 32/2021 Summary Court Order dated 18.03.2026 The court examined the cross-examination of defendants 15-17 regarding a property dispute involving temple land. The petitioners filed the case claiming land measuring 13½ cents (Survey No. 125/114) was purchased for temple construction but was found registered in others' names. The court found the defendants' statements lack merit and dismissed their contentions. The court ruled that the petition should proceed against all defendants and that the case cannot be dismissed based on defendants' arguments. Petition dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts