Ganesan vs Karuppaiah — 16/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or 7 R 1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000202023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
25/2023
Filing Date
10-02-2023
Registration No
16/2023
Registration Date
10-02-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesan
Adv. Sundar.V
Respondent(s)
Karuppaiah
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 21-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 15-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 440-day delay in substituting the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff is allowed. Although the petitioner provided no valid reason for the substantial delay exceeding one year, the court deemed it important to give every person a reasonable opportunity to be heard. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000/- on the petitioner to be paid to the respondent as a consequence of the unjustified delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 440-day delay in substituting the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff is allowed. Although the petitioner provided no valid reason for the substantial delay exceeding one year, the court deemed it important to give every person a reasonable opportunity to be heard. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000/- on the petitioner to be paid to the respondent as a consequence of the unjustified delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts