Ganesan vs Karuppaiah — 16/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R 1. Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000202023
Filing Number
25/2023
Filing Date
10-Feb-2023
Registration No
16/2023
Registration Date
10-Feb-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Last updated 09-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ganesan
Adv. Sundar.V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karuppaiah
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
21-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
15-Apr-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Apr-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
24-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
02-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
IA orderView PDF
SUMMARY: The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 440-day delay in substituting the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff is allowed. Although the petitioner provided no valid reason for the substantial delay exceeding one year, the court deemed it important to give every person a reasonable opportunity to be heard. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000/- on the petitioner to be paid to the respondent as a consequence of the unjustified delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
13-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
07-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
02-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
05-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
25-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
03-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
22-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
09-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
26-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
16-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
02-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
18-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
04-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
17-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
01-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif
-
04-Jun-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
20-Mar-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
17-Feb-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
06-Jan-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
18-Nov-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
23-Oct-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
29-Aug-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif
-
26-Jul-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
11-Jun-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
02-Apr-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
23-Feb-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
30-Jan-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
20-Dec-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
15-Nov-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
03-Oct-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
15-Sep-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Aug-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
10-Jul-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
05-Jun-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
20-Mar-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif
-
10-Mar-2023
For further Proceedings
District Munsif
-
10-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2023
SUMMARY: The petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 440-day delay in substituting the legal heirs of a deceased plaintiff is allowed. Although the petitioner provided no valid reason for the substantial delay exceeding one year, the court deemed it important to give every person a reasonable opportunity to be heard. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 1,000/- on the petitioner to be paid to the respondent as a consequence of the unjustified delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts