Kalimuthu vs The District Collector Advocate - Mr.K. PONMUDI G.P. — 12/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV060000112025
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
15/2025
Filing Date
19-02-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
21-02-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Devakkottai
Judge
2-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalimuthu
Adv. Tr.S.Sevarkodiyon
Respondent(s)
The District Collector Advocate - Mr.K. PONMUDI G.P.
Tashildar
Adv. Mr.K. PONMUDI G.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 17-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 12/2025 Kalimuthu v. The District Collector Advocate (Mr. K. Ponmudi G.P.) and Tashildar The court heard witness testimony regarding a land dispute (Survey No. 12/14, 28 cents) classified as government wasteland (Thava Sath). During cross-examination, the witness stated he had limited knowledge about the property's details, had not reviewed relevant documents, and was unaware of petitioner's remedial actions before revenue authorities. The court found the witness testimony unreliable. The court determined the land currently remains classified as government wasteland without seizure, and therefore no relief can be granted to the petitioner. Petition dismissed; no cross-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 12/2025 Kalimuthu v. The District Collector Advocate (Mr. K. Ponmudi G.P.) and Tashildar The court heard witness testimony regarding a land dispute (Survey No. 12/14, 28 cents) classified as government wasteland (Thava Sath). During cross-examination, the witness stated he had limited knowledge about the property's details, had not reviewed relevant documents, and was unaware of petitioner's remedial actions before revenue authorities. The court found the witness testimony unreliable. The court determined the land currently remains classified as government wasteland without seizure, and therefore no relief can be granted to the petitioner. Petition dismissed; no cross-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts