Jeyakumar vs Subbulakshmi — 180/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 1663(1). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNSV050011402019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1248/2019
Filing Date
08-11-2019
Registration No
180/2019
Registration Date
20-12-2019
Court
Sub Court, Devakottai
Judge
1-Sub Judge , Devakottai
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeyakumar
Adv. Mr.V.Sankarapandian
Respondent(s)
Subbulakshmi
The Branch Manage, Oriental Insurance Company.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge , Devakottai
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders | |
| 26-02-2026 | Orders | |
| 19-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Mayiladuthurai awarded ₹3,69,997 in compensation to the plaintiff for injuries sustained in a December 2018 motor vehicle accident. The court found that the first defendant's truck driver caused the accident through rash and negligent driving at high speed, and liability was assigned to both defendants jointly and severally. The compensation covered medical expenses, 30% disability, future medical care, pain and suffering, attendant charges, and other incidental losses, with a 10% reduction applied for the plaintiff's failure to wear a helmet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Motor Vehicles Accident Claims Tribunal, Mayiladuthurai awarded ₹3,69,997 in compensation to the plaintiff for injuries sustained in a December 2018 motor vehicle accident. The court found that the first defendant's truck driver caused the accident through rash and negligent driving at high speed, and liability was assigned to both defendants jointly and severally. The compensation covered medical expenses, 30% disability, future medical care, pain and suffering, attendant charges, and other incidental losses, with a 10% reduction applied for the plaintiff's failure to wear a helmet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts