The Inspector, Karaikudi North P.S. vs Rajasekaran — 188/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,(b) 120(b),109,307,r/w 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV050010162022
Filing Number
188/2022
Filing Date
31-01-2023
Registration No
188/2022
Registration Date
06-02-2023
Court
Sub Court, Devakottai
Judge
1-Sub Judge , Devakottai
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector, Karaikudi North P.S.
Respondent(s)
Rajasekaran
Rajeshkumar
Karthikeyan
Latha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge , Devakottai
Disposed
Judgement
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 04-03-2026 | Trial |
| 23-02-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 188/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendants Rajeshkumar, Karthikeyan, and the fourth defendant of charges under IPC Sections 120(b), 109, and 307 read with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. The first defendant (Rajasekaran) died during proceedings, rendering charges against him moot. All three accused were discharged under CrPC Section 235(1). Key Reasoning: While the victim's testimony established that the first defendant attacked him with a knife on March 13, 2016, the remaining defendants' involvement in conspiracy and abetment could not be substantiated. Hearsay evidence and witnesses who did not directly observe the other defendants' participation proved insufficient to meet the standard of proof required in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 188/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendants Rajeshkumar, Karthikeyan, and the fourth defendant of charges under IPC Sections 120(b), 109, and 307 read with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case beyond reasonable doubt. The first defendant (Rajasekaran) died during proceedings, rendering charges against him moot. All three accused were discharged under CrPC Section 235(1). Key Reasoning: While the victim's testimony established that the first defendant attacked him with a knife on March 13, 2016, the remaining defendants' involvement in conspiracy and abetment could not be substantiated. Hearsay evidence and witnesses who did not directly observe the other defendants' participation proved insufficient to meet the standard of proof required in criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts