John Peter vs Sathish Inbarajan — 59/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,3(1). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNSV050006962021

Filing Number

768/2021

Filing Date

14-Sep-2021

Registration No

59/2021

Registration Date

22-Sep-2021

Court

Sub Court, Devakottai

Judge

1-Sub Judge , Devakottai

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,3(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.John Peter

    Adv. Mr.K.Mohan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sathish Inbarajan

  2. 2.Micheal Tenis

  3. 3.The United India Insurance Co, Ltd. Karaikudi rep. by its Branch Manager.

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  10. 30-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  11. 11-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  13. 31-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  14. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  15. 05-Jun-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition (PW 2) recorded on 05.06.2025 in MCOP 59/2021 before the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai. The witness testified regarding a two-wheeler accident involving Sathish Inbarajan where a cow crossed the road, causing braking and resulting in a fall. Under cross-examination, the witness admitted giving testimony to support the petitioner's compensation claim, though denying the petitioner was responsible for the accident. The deposition was recorded and confirmed as accurate by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  18. 20-Mar-2025

    Copy of depositionView PDF

  19. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  20. 12-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  21. 12-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  22. 29-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  23. 29-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  24. 29-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  25. 29-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  26. 14-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  27. 04-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  28. 05-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  29. 28-Aug-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  30. 27-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  31. 15-Jun-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  32. 01-Feb-2023

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  33. 15-Nov-2022

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  34. 30-Aug-2022

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  35. 21-Jun-2022

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  36. 01-Mar-2022

    Counter

    Sub Judge , Devakottai

  37. 07-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 14-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2021

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition (PW 2) recorded on 05.06.2025 in MCOP 59/2021 before the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai. The witness testified regarding a two-wheeler accident involving Sathish Inbarajan where a cow crossed the road, causing braking and resulting in a fall. Under cross-examination, the witness admitted giving testimony to support the petitioner's compensation claim, though denying the petitioner was responsible for the accident. The deposition was recorded and confirmed as accurate by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case