Ganesh vs Udayammai alias Usha — 175/2021

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13,(1)(ib). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSV050005922021

Arguments

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

664/2021

Filing Date

09-08-2021

Registration No

175/2021

Registration Date

19-08-2021

Court

Sub Court, Devakottai

Judge

1-Sub Judge , Devakottai

Acts & Sections

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 Section 13,(1)(ib)

Petitioner(s)

Ganesh

Adv. Mr.S.Sornaprakash

Respondent(s)

Udayammai alias Usha

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge , Devakottai

28-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Arguments

17-03-2026

Arguments

10-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

20-03-2025
Copy of deposition

Summary This is a Tamil court order (HMOP No. 175/2021) dated 20.03.2025 documenting the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Ganesh) in what appears to be a matrimonial dispute case. The witness's testimony was recorded and he was cross-examined on various allegations including claims about spousal cohabitation duration (9 months), financial support via ATM cards, jewelry (10 pounds of gold), maintenance of children, and allegations of infidelity. The court found the witness's statements largely inconsistent and lacking supporting documentary evidence. No explicit final order granting or dismissing any petition is stated in this excerpt; this portion documents only the examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Tamil court order (HMOP No. 175/2021) dated 20.03.2025 documenting the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Ganesh) in what appears to be a matrimonial dispute case. The witness's testimony was recorded and he was cross-examined on various allegations including claims about spousal cohabitation duration (9 months), financial support via ATM cards, jewelry (10 pounds of gold), maintenance of children, and allegations of infidelity. The court found the witness's statements largely inconsistent and lacking supporting documentary evidence. No explicit final order granting or dismissing any petition is stated in this excerpt; this portion documents only the examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Devakottai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case