Ganesh vs Udayammai alias Usha — 175/2021
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13,(1)(ib). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNSV050005922021
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
664/2021
Filing Date
09-08-2021
Registration No
175/2021
Registration Date
19-08-2021
Court
Sub Court, Devakottai
Judge
1-Sub Judge , Devakottai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh
Adv. Mr.S.Sornaprakash
Respondent(s)
Udayammai alias Usha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge , Devakottai
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Tamil court order (HMOP No. 175/2021) dated 20.03.2025 documenting the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Ganesh) in what appears to be a matrimonial dispute case. The witness's testimony was recorded and he was cross-examined on various allegations including claims about spousal cohabitation duration (9 months), financial support via ATM cards, jewelry (10 pounds of gold), maintenance of children, and allegations of infidelity. The court found the witness's statements largely inconsistent and lacking supporting documentary evidence. No explicit final order granting or dismissing any petition is stated in this excerpt; this portion documents only the examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Tamil court order (HMOP No. 175/2021) dated 20.03.2025 documenting the cross-examination of witness PW1 (Ganesh) in what appears to be a matrimonial dispute case. The witness's testimony was recorded and he was cross-examined on various allegations including claims about spousal cohabitation duration (9 months), financial support via ATM cards, jewelry (10 pounds of gold), maintenance of children, and allegations of infidelity. The court found the witness's statements largely inconsistent and lacking supporting documentary evidence. No explicit final order granting or dismissing any petition is stated in this excerpt; this portion documents only the examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts