Sampavika Education Foundation Secretary, Mrs.S.Rani vs R.M.kasi Advocate - CHANDRASEKARAN.S — 559/2019
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 35,27(c). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV030011832019
Filing Number
1010/2019
Filing Date
02-06-2015
Registration No
559/2019
Registration Date
03-06-2015
Court
Sub Court, Sivagangai
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sampavika Education Foundation Secretary, Mrs.S.Rani
Adv. SARAVANAN.L
Sampavika Education Foundation Secretary, A.M.Sekar
A.M.Sekar
S.Rani
Respondent(s)
R.M.kasi Advocate - CHANDRASEKARAN.S
Balamurugan.K
Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN.S
Malarveni
Adv. BALACHANDRAN.K
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 559/2019 (Sampavika Education Foundation) Court's Decision The court dismissed the plaintiffs' (Sampavika Education Foundation officials) case against defendants R.M. Kasi, K. Balamurugan, and Malarveni. The court ruled that the first defendant unlawfully mismanaged the trust's affairs by failing to properly account for financial records, violated trust bylaws regarding trustee appointment procedures, and improperly registered a seventh trustee (M.S. Karthikeyan) when the trust deed limited membership to six trustees. The court found no merit in the plaintiffs' claims and determined that defendants 2 and 3 acted appropriately in removing first defendant from trust governance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 559/2019 (Sampavika Education Foundation) Court's Decision The court dismissed the plaintiffs' (Sampavika Education Foundation officials) case against defendants R.M. Kasi, K. Balamurugan, and Malarveni. The court ruled that the first defendant unlawfully mismanaged the trust's affairs by failing to properly account for financial records, violated trust bylaws regarding trustee appointment procedures, and improperly registered a seventh trustee (M.S. Karthikeyan) when the trust deed limited membership to six trustees. The court found no merit in the plaintiffs' claims and determined that defendants 2 and 3 acted appropriately in removing first defendant from trust governance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts