Sivagangai District Kalayarkoil Taluk, Uthikulam village Muthaiya Koil Pangaligal vs Kasiviswanathan Advocate - MADHANMOHAN.A — 564/2019
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b),24. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 17th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV030011582019
Filing Number
993/2019
Filing Date
08-11-2019
Registration No
564/2019
Registration Date
15-11-2019
Court
Sub Court, Sivagangai
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivagangai District Kalayarkoil Taluk, Uthikulam village Muthaiya Koil Pangaligal
Muthukarupan
Adv. SITHEESWARAN.G
Karuppiah
Kuppan @ Puchi
Pandi
Respondent(s)
Kasiviswanathan Advocate - MADHANMOHAN.A
Vadivel
Udaiyar
Adv. MADHANMOHAN.A
Chandra Mohan
Adv. MADHANMOHAN.A
Karu.Ramaiah
Adv. MADHANMOHAN.A
Karu.Muthaiah
Adv. MADHANMOHAN.A
District Collector Sivagangai
Adv. MADHANMOHAN.A
Thasildhar
Adv. MADHANMOHAN.A
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 564/2019 - Sivagangai District Court Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiffs' case. The court found insufficient evidence that the Uthikulam village temple (Survey No. 419/1, Area 0.52.5 acres) belonged exclusively to the Mutharaya community as claimed. The plaintiffs failed to produce credible documentary proof or reliable witness testimony establishing their alleged ancestral ownership and religious rights over the disputed temple property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 564/2019 - Sivagangai District Court Court Decision: The court rejected the plaintiffs' case. The court found insufficient evidence that the Uthikulam village temple (Survey No. 419/1, Area 0.52.5 acres) belonged exclusively to the Mutharaya community as claimed. The plaintiffs failed to produce credible documentary proof or reliable witness testimony establishing their alleged ancestral ownership and religious rights over the disputed temple property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts