Muthuramalingam vs Valarmathi — 540/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(6). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV030009732019
Filing Number
825/2019
Filing Date
07-09-2019
Registration No
540/2019
Registration Date
19-10-2019
Court
Sub Court, Sivagangai
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muthuramalingam
Adv. MUTHURAMAN.T
Sonamuthu
Vellaisamy
Ganesan
Nagu
Ravi
Rajendran
Sharsagan
Respondent(s)
Valarmathi
Pandi
Chellapandi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 540/2019 Summary Court's Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims for declaration and permanent injunction regarding eight property items (parts of Survey No. 280/3, totaling 3.20 acres). The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their ownership rights to the disputed property parcels and could not provide convincing evidence that the settlement deed (2010), rectification deed (2011), and sale deed (2017) should be voided. The court ruled against all eight plaintiffs regarding their respective property items and rejected their claims to void the three deeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 540/2019 Summary Court's Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims for declaration and permanent injunction regarding eight property items (parts of Survey No. 280/3, totaling 3.20 acres). The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their ownership rights to the disputed property parcels and could not provide convincing evidence that the settlement deed (2010), rectification deed (2011), and sale deed (2017) should be voided. The court ruled against all eight plaintiffs regarding their respective property items and rejected their claims to void the three deeds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts