MEENATCHI vs MANICKAM — 1/2026
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 104(1)(1),ORDER 43 RULE 1(V),ORDER 41 RULE 5. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th March 2026.
CMA - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
CNR: TNSV030007042025
e-Filing Number
04-12-2025
Filing Number
776/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
Sub Court, Sivagangai
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MEENATCHI
Adv. vijayananth G
Respondent(s)
MANICKAM
SEETHALAKSHMI
SURULIVASAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Disposed
Orders
Enquiry
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-02-2026 | Orders | |
| 03-02-2026 | Enquiry | |
| 03-01-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's order dated 09.10.2025 in an execution petition. The appellants challenged an order that rejected their claim for a 1/6 share in ancestral property (Survey No. 20/3), arguing they were entitled to the share as descendants of the original property owner. The court found the lower court wrongly dismissed the petition on technical grounds without proper hearing and held that questions regarding daughters' inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act 2005 cannot be decided in execution proceedings alone—a separate partition suit must be filed to determine the appellant's rightful share in the full property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's order dated 09.10.2025 in an execution petition. The appellants challenged an order that rejected their claim for a 1/6 share in ancestral property (Survey No. 20/3), arguing they were entitled to the share as descendants of the original property owner. The court found the lower court wrongly dismissed the petition on technical grounds without proper hearing and held that questions regarding daughters' inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act 2005 cannot be decided in execution proceedings alone—a separate partition suit must be filed to determine the appellant's rightful share in the full property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts