S.Nachiappan vs L.Maniarasan Advocate - SEKAR.N — 300120/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNSV030002622017

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

300120/2017

Filing Date

24-04-2017

Registration No

300120/2017

Registration Date

24-04-2017

Court

Sub Court, Sivagangai

Judge

3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7R1

Petitioner(s)

S.Nachiappan

Adv. A.Prabhakar

Respondent(s)

L.Maniarasan Advocate - SEKAR.N

Hearing History

Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE

28-04-2026

Evidence

17-04-2026

IA Pending

10-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

15-12-2025
IA order
28-04-2026
IA order
28-04-2026
IA order

Case Summary: 300120/2017 (I.A. No. 4/2026) The Subordinate Court, Sivagangai allowed a petition filed by S. Nachiappan against L. Maniarasan Advocate (Sekar.N) on 28 April 2026. The petition sought permission to file certain documents out of time relating to a property dispute involving a will deed and property inheritance rights. The court admitted the petition under CPC Rule 8(1)(3) and Section 151, accepting the delayed documents "subject to proof and relevancy" as the materials were crucial to the pending civil suit (O.S. No. 343/2024) concerning the property's ownership. No relief was granted to the opposite party as the court found no prejudice in admitting these documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 300120/2017 (I.A. No. 4/2026) The Subordinate Court, Sivagangai allowed a petition filed by S. Nachiappan against L. Maniarasan Advocate (Sekar.N) on 28 April 2026. The petition sought permission to file certain documents out of time relating to a property dispute involving a will deed and property inheritance rights. The court admitted the petition under CPC Rule 8(1)(3) and Section 151, accepting the delayed documents "subject to proof and relevancy" as the materials were crucial to the pending civil suit (O.S. No. 343/2024) concerning the property's ownership. No relief was granted to the opposite party as the court found no prejudice in admitting these documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case