Nagarajan vs Jothimani — 12/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNSV030001922021

Evidence

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

157/2021

Filing Date

26-03-2021

Registration No

12/2021

Registration Date

26-03-2021

Court

Sub Court, Sivagangai

Judge

3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 140,166,

Petitioner(s)

Nagarajan

Adv. RAJKUMAR.S.M

Respondent(s)

Jothimani

The Regional Manager Nagarajan, New India Assurance Company, Madurai

Nagarajan

The National Insurance company, Madurai

Hearing History

Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE

29-04-2026

Evidence

09-04-2026

Evidence

01-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
Copy of deposition

Case Summary Case: MCOP No. 12/2021, dated 13.02.2026 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims for compensation in a two-wheeler motor vehicle accident case. The court found that the petitioner's wife and son had already received compensation through separate cases (MCOP Nos. 70/2014 and 71/2014), and therefore the petitioner is not entitled to claim further damages from the fourth respondent. The court also noted procedural issues and determined the compensation claim to be excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: MCOP No. 12/2021, dated 13.02.2026 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's claims for compensation in a two-wheeler motor vehicle accident case. The court found that the petitioner's wife and son had already received compensation through separate cases (MCOP Nos. 70/2014 and 71/2014), and therefore the petitioner is not entitled to claim further damages from the fourth respondent. The court also noted procedural issues and determined the compensation claim to be excessive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Sivagangai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case