Abdul Reghuman vs Palaniappan Advocate - K.Rajakili — 300055/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 42. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSV030000552014
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Date
28-04-2014
Registration No
300055/2014
Registration Date
28-04-2014
Court
Sub Court, Sivagangai
Judge
3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Reghuman
Adv. L.Saravanan
Respondent(s)
Palaniappan Advocate - K.Rajakili
Hearing History
Judge: 3-SUBORDINATE JUDGE
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 08-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 01-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 23-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 300055/2014 Case: I.A.No.6/2026 in O.S.No.55/2014 Court: Subordinate Court, Sivagangai Date: 16.04.2026 Parties: R. Palaniappan (Petitioner/Defendant) v. Abdul Reghuman (Respondent/Plaintiff) Order: The court allowed the recall petition and ordered that witness PW3 (a government official) be recalled to allow the defendant to cross-examine him. The court found that the defendant was denied adequate opportunity for cross-examination when PW3 was initially examined, and that procedural fairness required recalling the witness. The case was adjourned for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 300055/2014 Case: I.A.No.6/2026 in O.S.No.55/2014 Court: Subordinate Court, Sivagangai Date: 16.04.2026 Parties: R. Palaniappan (Petitioner/Defendant) v. Abdul Reghuman (Respondent/Plaintiff) Order: The court allowed the recall petition and ordered that witness PW3 (a government official) be recalled to allow the defendant to cross-examine him. The court found that the defendant was denied adequate opportunity for cross-examination when PW3 was initially examined, and that procedural fairness required recalling the witness. The case was adjourned for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts