Jayaramu vs Anpazhalan Advocate - KARTHIKEYARAJAN.S — 300004/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSV030000062018
Filing Number
300004/2018
Filing Date
04-Jan-2018
Registration No
300004/2018
Registration Date
04-Jan-2018
Court
Sub Court, Sivagangai
Judge
3-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jayaramu
Adv. Srinivasaragavan
-
2.Anbucheliyan
Adv. Srinivasaragavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anpazhalan Advocate - KARTHIKEYARAJAN.S
-
2.Pandiyan
-
3.Subrmanian
Adv. Chandrasekaran
-
4.Fathima Beevi
Adv. Xavier Raj
-
5.Syed Abuthakir
-
6.Amardheen
-
7.Jamal Mohamed
Adv. Xavier Raj
-
8.Kamardheen
Adv. Xavier Raj
-
9.Beer Mohamed
Adv. Xavier Raj
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Judgement
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Aug-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
This is a Tamil language court order from OS No. 4/2018 dated 18.08.2025. The judgment addresses a property dispute involving contested claims about when property was acquired and the validity of agreements between parties. The court's analysis focuses on examining conflicting testimonies regarding an agreement dated 28.09.1980 versus 22.09.1996, the legitimacy of a 1947 will, and the defendant's acquisition of property in 2012. The court concludes that the defendant lawfully acquired the property and that the plaintiffs' claims regarding fraudulent transfer are unfounded, rejecting their contentions about improper dealings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Restored
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Disposed
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Jul-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Jul-2023
Part Heard
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Part Heard
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Jun-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
21-Jun-2023
Part Heard
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Jun-2023
Part Heard
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Part Heard
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Mar-2023
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
23-Mar-2023
Part Heard
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Mar-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Feb-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jan-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jan-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Nov-2022
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Nov-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Oct-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Sep-2022
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
07-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Sep-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Aug-2022
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Aug-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jun-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Apr-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Apr-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Apr-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Feb-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Jan-2022
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Dec-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Nov-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Nov-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Nov-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Oct-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Sep-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Sep-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Sep-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Aug-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jul-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Jun-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Apr-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Mar-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Feb-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jan-2021
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Nov-2020
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Sep-2020
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jul-2020
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
06-May-2020
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
24-Apr-2020
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Mar-2020
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2019
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Sep-2019
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2019
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Apr-2019
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Mar-2019
Trial
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Feb-2019
Mediation
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jan-2019
Mediation
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Nov-2018
Mediation
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Sep-2018
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Aug-2018
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Jul-2018
Issues
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jun-2018
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Apr-2018
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 300004/2018
This is a Tamil language court order from OS No. 4/2018 dated 18.08.2025. The judgment addresses a property dispute involving contested claims about when property was acquired and the validity of agreements between parties. The court's analysis focuses on examining conflicting testimonies regarding an agreement dated 28.09.1980 versus 22.09.1996, the legitimacy of a 1947 will, and the defendant's acquisition of property in 2012. The court concludes that the defendant lawfully acquired the property and that the plaintiffs' claims regarding fraudulent transfer are unfounded, rejecting their contentions about improper dealings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts