Inspector of Police, Thiruvegampathur P.S vs Arjunan — 192/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,307,506(2),326,34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV020067972024
Filing Number
6441/2024
Filing Date
06-Sep-2024
Registration No
192/2024
Registration Date
06-Sep-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector of Police, Thiruvegampathur P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arjunan
-
2.Ashwini
-
3.Dharani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Assistant Sessions Judge acquitted all three accused persons of charges including attempted murder, grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and harassment of women. The court found critical inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, including contradictory witness statements about the sequence of assaults, material gaps in the investigation (failure to seize blood-stained evidence, delayed FIR registration), and doubts surrounding the arrest, confession, and seizure of the weapon. The court concluded the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Dec-2025
Questioning
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Nov-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jun-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
09-Jun-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
09-Jun-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
09-Jun-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-May-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
26-Mar-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Mar-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2025
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2024
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Trial
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2024
Framing of Charges
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Oct-2024
Framing of Charges
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 192/2024
Case Summary The Assistant Sessions Judge acquitted all three accused persons of charges including attempted murder, grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and harassment of women. The court found critical inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, including contradictory witness statements about the sequence of assaults, material gaps in the investigation (failure to seize blood-stained evidence, delayed FIR registration), and doubts surrounding the arrest, confession, and seizure of the weapon. The court concluded the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts