Inspector of Police, Thiruvegampathur P.S vs Arjunan — 192/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,307,506(2),326,34,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV020067972024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6441/2024
Filing Date
06-09-2024
Registration No
192/2024
Registration Date
06-09-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Thiruvegampathur P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Arjunan
Ashwini
Dharani
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement | |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Assistant Sessions Judge acquitted all three accused persons of charges including attempted murder, grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and harassment of women. The court found critical inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, including contradictory witness statements about the sequence of assaults, material gaps in the investigation (failure to seize blood-stained evidence, delayed FIR registration), and doubts surrounding the arrest, confession, and seizure of the weapon. The court concluded the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Assistant Sessions Judge acquitted all three accused persons of charges including attempted murder, grievous hurt, criminal intimidation, and harassment of women. The court found critical inconsistencies in the prosecution's evidence, including contradictory witness statements about the sequence of assaults, material gaps in the investigation (failure to seize blood-stained evidence, delayed FIR registration), and doubts surrounding the arrest, confession, and seizure of the weapon. The court concluded the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts