Inspector of Police, Poovanthi P.S vs Karthick@Andankarthick Advocate - Mr.K.Manivannan — 27/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 286,338,IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNSV020054572024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5298/2021
Filing Date
07-04-2021
Registration No
27/2021
Registration Date
07-04-2021
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Sivagangai
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
Poovanthi Police Station
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, Poovanthi P.S
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Karthick@Andankarthick Advocate - Mr.K.Manivannan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a witness deposition document (P.W. 9) in Case No. S.C. 27/2021 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, recorded on 20.04.2026. The witness, a police investigator, testified about registering an FIR (No. 67/2019) based on a complaint received on 14.06.2019 under IPC Sections 286, 337, and the Explosives Act 1884, and submitted relevant documents to the court. During cross-examination, the defense challenged certain procedural aspects of the FIR registration and raised questions about identification of the accused and the timely filing of the First Information Report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness deposition document (P.W. 9) in Case No. S.C. 27/2021 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai, recorded on 20.04.2026. The witness, a police investigator, testified about registering an FIR (No. 67/2019) based on a complaint received on 14.06.2019 under IPC Sections 286, 337, and the Explosives Act 1884, and submitted relevant documents to the court. During cross-examination, the defense challenged certain procedural aspects of the FIR registration and raised questions about identification of the accused and the timely filing of the First Information Report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts